MEG Inventor Tom Bearden:
Did the Soviets Cause
the Challenger Disaster?
YOWUSA.COM, 06-May-02
Janice Manning
…Continued
The Tom Bearden Website
Historical Background of Scalar EM Weapons
On Jan. 28, 1986 the Challenger disaster occurred. The Challenger was positively killed by the Soviet Union, using the scalar EM weapons through the Woodpecker grid.
A host of indicators occurred. … The anomalous cold weather in Florida was definitely engineered by the USSR, … Specialized cloud patterns associated with Soviet grid
engineering and weather engineering were observed and photographed in Los Angeles, California and Huntsville, Alabama, beginning several days before the incident, and particularly on the evening before the launch,
 … The normal "pivot point" for turning the jetstream northeastward was moved south
from Huntsville, Alabama to Birmingham, Alabama by the Soviets; this was to force the jetstream much further south, and consequently move unusually cold air into the Florida panhandle, exposing the shuttle
to undue cold stress,
… About 4 hours before launch; all Soviet ships off shore suddenly left the area at speed; this was the first shuttle launch not "shadowed" by Soviet ships,
… On the morning of the launch, higher frequencies were added to the interference grid to enable much-enhanced localization. The brains of small birds are very
sensitive to these higher frequencies, due to their small diameter (wavelength) as a scalar EM receiver. If they remained in the area of localization, the birds would be in intense pain or killed. On the morning of
the launch, national TV network news, announcers, noted that no birds at all were flying in the area, something which had never happened before.
… At the time of the shuttle's destruction, a giant radial cloud pattern was actually in the general vicinity; … Three previous shuttle launches—the last on Nov.
26,1985—had been used as direct test targets for tests of the Soviet launch phase ABM/antibomber defense system so the weapon was "zeroed in" on the launch site, … The
anomalous destruction of the Arrow DC-8 on Dec. 12, 1985 had already indicated a Soviet decision to elevate the testing to the actual destruction of
targeted vehicles, … At the time of the launch, anomalous electromagnetic phenomena occurred in nearby restaurants, … A metal-softening signal was on the grid, as
previously detected by Golden. This signal would be detected by the launch flame, and after ignition would result in a steady weakening of the metal in and around the booster flame. Note that the metal was already
cold-stressed beyond what it had been tested to withstand, … Almost immediately after ignition, the booster seals vented, giving evidence that the cold stress and the
metal-softening signal were weakening the system, … An anomalous 10 second or so burnthrough of the weakened booster occurred,
… An anomalous "1ight"—possibly a Soviet EM missile —was observed to play on the rocket before it blew up, … An anomalous "flat plate" earthquake over about 11
states occurred within days after destruction of the shuttle. This type of quake is strongly suspicious, and it was probably the test of the grid/howitzers in a ground wave interferometry mode,
… Substantial winds and air turbulence over the launch site increased the stress on the Challenger as it rose through this region. With a giant cloud radial in the
area, one strongly suspects that the turbulence may have been deliberately created or augmented by the Soviet scalar EM grid, … A few days later, from 1-4 February 1986, many birds
inadvertently flew into the new, localized "pivot point" at Birmingham, Alabama, encountered the high frequency components, and dead birds fell from the sky in
substantial numbers. Many different kinds of birds were involved. … Most significant of all, General Daniel Graham has reported that, on the evening after the death of the
Challenger, the Soviet KGBgave a party and celebrated the success of their perfect active measures against the Challenger! [emphasis mine -- JM] Note that all
development, deployment, employment, and command and control of the Soviet scalar EM weapons are under the KGB. Finally, a U.S. classified investigation of the Challenger disaster was ordered by Congress, but its
results have not been made public. Beyond any doubt the Soviets destroyed the Challenger, and killed the seven brave astronauts aboard the spaceship.
Has Tom Bearden established EM weaponry as a scientific fact? Yes, definitely. If so, will this Cold War technology come back to haunt us again?
EM: Defensive Shield or Offensive Nightmare?
Was the ill will needed to the destruction of the Challenger present in the Soviet Union? Obviously the answer is yes, as we were still in the depths of
the Cold War at that time. But, did Russia terminate the program after the end of the Cold War?
In present day terms, this raises a new and troubling question.
Could Russia's recently muted objections to a U.S. proposed development of a national defensive shield be the result of their own continued efforts to develop and possibly export EM weapons?
Wall Street Journal February, 2, 2001
Exact Target of Missile-Defense System Being Pushed by Bush, Is Still Unclear
For many missile-defense advocates, the jewel in the crown is still Mr. Reagan's vision of a space-based system, though it's anathema to Moscow. The Pentagon has
a demonstration program that could put an experimental laser in space by 2012. But fielding such a system could take decades, and no one has a good estimate of cost.
Any attempt to put even defensive weapons in space would be highly controversial. Such a system also would be vulnerable to attack. The senior Mr. Bush hoped to overcome both of those flaws with his proposal to share
the technology with U.S. allies and the Russians. Predictions vary on how the world would react if Mr. Bush chose to build a large, treaty-busting system.
Missile-defense backers say that with time, U.S. allies and rivals would adjust. But a CIA report prepared for the White House last year outlines some disturbing
scenarios, including a possible Chinese nuclear buildup that would spur an arms race in Asia involving India and Pakistan. And it warns that the Russians or Chinese
could sell "countermeasures" and other system busting technology to the likes of North Korea, Iran or Iraq.
Given that the Russians have already developed unspecified "countermeasures," is it likely that the Russian government is still interested in
keeping this technology to itself as opposed to sharing with China or any of the Axis of Evil states? If so, let us hope the Russian's have not exported this technology.
|
