 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HOME | RADIO | NEWS | EBOOKS | VIDEOS | MESSAGE BOARD | CATALOG | SUBSCRIBER |
| 2012 - Planet X | Earth | Extraterrestrial | Humanity | Nostradamus | SciTech | Space | War |
|
|
|
|
Wormwood Prophecies: How An
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Nuclear reactors in the rest of the world are built to withstand a 9.0 quake, which has a very slim statistical probability. However, the 6.0 capability of the Chernobyl sarcophagus is most likely a highly optimistic estimate at this time due to the present condition of the sarcophagus. In short, the structure is highly vulnerable to attack. If were attacked, where does the danger lie?
Chernobyl Today Web Site
Tons of Missing Chernobyl Reactor Fuel
Scientists have been able to estimate the amounts of radioactive fuel blown into the atmosphere and into the remains of the Unit No. 4, but they leave about 10 to 50 tons of reactor fuel unaccounted for. Three different scenarios have been raised to attempt to explain this mystery:
Some or all of the missing fuel may have been released in the explosion the missing fuel may have been spewed out in the fire that occurred after the explosion or perhaps the missing fuel is buried deep under the rubble in the reactor, yet to be discovered
"Finding the missing fuel is an extremely important question for us - the nuclear safety of the [reactor] depends on it," says Edward Pazukhin, head of the ISTC's department of nuclear safety. Pazukhin says this because a growing pool of water in the bowels of the reactor may cause the remaining fuel to go critical.
Short of an earthquake, what could happen to create an even more catastrophic Chernobyl disaster?
For years, Russia has claimed that Chechen rebels were receiving financial and logistical support from the "international jihad" movement orchestrated by Al Qaeda. This fact was finally accepted by the US, but only after the attack on 9/11.
Now that al Qaeda proved on 9/11 that it could turn commercial airliners and the tons of fuel they carry into building-busting terrorist cruise missiles, Al Qaeda-backed Chechen rebels present a new nuclear threat to Russia and the world at large. If a similar attack is carried out at Chernobyl, this threat could again send nuclear fallout towards Europe with an impact on Reactor #4; an attack that could be far more devastating than the original accident.
In that area of the world, Russian-made airliners are used extensively. They are heavier, and carry much greater fuel loads
|
If a commercial Ilyushin IL-96 were hijacked and flown into Reactor #4 at Chernobyl it would impact with a force greater than a Boeing 767 (similar to those used against the WTC) and would likely collapse the sarcophagus and drive far enough down through the reactor to trigger a reaction. This is because the Ilyushin is much heavier than a 767 and carries nearly twice as much fuel.
Given this possibility, has a disaster like this been foreseen in the past? If so, has it yet to be fulfilled in the present?
In examining both secular and Judeo-Christian prophecy regarding the possibility of another Chernobyl disaster, it is important to understand the context of its meaning as it was in the days when the prophecies were first issued.
Prophets of the past, for whom primitive technologies dominated, simply lacked the technological understanding in their visions of what we now take for granted. Therefore, before we delve into their prophecies we must first try to understand their context beginning with how they received their visions.
[1] [2]
We often received emails from people complaining about the mockery and abuse they receive from family, friends and co-workers when discussing this topic.
Our view is that this topic should never be introduced to others, until they demonstrate a geniune interest.
Nonetheless, those with a genuine interest in the topic will feel a natural urge to share their concerns about a possible threat to themselves and those close to them. Consequently, the most common questions they ask are, "where is Planet X, and what is the most likely worst case scenario?" GO
As moviegoers flock to see Sony's new 2012 film, critics, debunkers and cynics are spewing forth a flood of poison pen pronouncements.
Taken altogether, it is a bizarre twist on the Biblical story of Noah and the Flood — and with strikingly similar themes.
For those new to the topic of 2012, the film is great entertainment, but it also drives home an ancient failing of humanity. That the common folk are often the last to know, whether by their own choices or those made for them by wealthy and powerful elites. Ergo, many will never ask, "where will I be in 2012?" They'll just have enough time to ask, "My God, what's happening?" GO
|
Also For Your Listening Pleasure |
| HOME | RADIO | NEWS | EBOOKS | VIDEOS | MESSAGE BOARD | CATALOG | SUBSCRIBER |
| 2012 - Planet X | Earth | Extraterrestrial | Humanity | Nostradamus | SciTech | Space | War |
|
|
| ©2009 Your World, Inc. — All Rights Reserved | ||
| The Sagan Continuation Project: We WELCOME all who RESPECT our FREE WILL. If you CHOOSE to HELP, then help us to help ourselves. There is GOOD HERE too. WE LOOK for a reply, | ||
|
|
||
One of the best-known prophets of Old
Testament times was Ezekiel. In Chapter 38 of his book, he predicted two major disasters that would come at a time of sudden war in Israel, deemed the beginning of the “End
Times.” Later, John, the Apostle gave one of these disasters a name; he called it “Wormwood.” Prophets seldom apply proper names to their predictions for fear of
being called false, so John’s naming of this disaster clearly demonstrates his unwavering certainty of this prediction. Further, his prophecy is also mirrored in several secular prophecies, such as
those of the Hopi and Mother Shipton. However, what could a modern day Wormwood disaster look like and who would create it?
