 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HOME | RADIO | NEWS | EBOOKS | VIDEOS | MESSAGE BOARD | CATALOG | SUBSCRIBER |
| 2012 - Planet X | Earth | Extraterrestrial | Humanity | Nostradamus | SciTech | Space | War |
|
|
|
|
Are We in the Quiet Before
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
All extraordinary in magnitude, do they stoke the Sun’s furnace much in the same way a extra log sparks greater intensity in a camp fire? If so, the Sun’s current history of hyperactive behavior has resulted in new and greater classes of flares. Along with them have come new classifications, to describe and document these unprecedented flares. Then, suddenly, the Sun dies down and the foolish say, “hooray,” or “no need for concern anymore.” Meanwhile, those who know better quietly fret because the “why” questions remain unanswered, but there is one possible answer. Planet X.
Assuming there is a Planet X, it and its massive field of gravitationally gripped comets, meteors, and asteroids are now returning from the darkest regions at the edge of our solar system. Gravitationally drawn toward the Sun, Planet X and its flotilla are approaching at an ever-increasing velocity, as basic Newtonian physics principles would confirm.
The assumption that all things will continue to behave in Darwinian manner, which accounts for slow changes over a period of time, is based on an Earth-centric view. Such thinking does not explain the possibility that Planet X is in a period of fleeting interlude with other bodies in our solar system.
During its incoming travel, Planet X can be gravitationally, electrically and electromagnetically interacting with the massive gas giants in our system, thereby temporarily diverting its previous fire away from the Sun. In a manner of speaking, Jupiter could be protecting Earth from Planet X-induced solar hyperactivity, in a guardian role similar to the one it plays with asteroids. Were it not for Jupiter, our precious planet would have been pulverized beyond any ability to sustain life eons ago. So perhaps, we’re enjoying a brief respite thanks to Jupiter, Saturn and perhaps even Uranus. If so, what happens when Earth’s big brothers and sisters are no longer able to run interference?
Such was the pondering of the late Dr. Robert S. Harrington, chief astronomer of the United States Naval Observatory. His early work determined that Planet X is approaching from below the ecliptic (beneath our table, so to speak) and is in a comet-like inclined orbit. Dr. Harrington estimated it be an angle of about 40 degrees to the ecliptic.
This means that, each and every day, that Planet X is traveling closer to the ecliptic, its flirtation with the Sun should starting growing to more torrid levels. Perhaps this is the subliminal message of Knowing. That Earth faces a brutal beating from an enraged Sun. A message that dates back to 1991, when Dr. Harrington went to Black Birch, New Zealand with small telescope. What he saw we’ll never know for sure because of his untimely death shortly after making that observation.
YOWUSA.COM, 22-May-2008
Planet X and the Mysterious Death of Dr. Robert Harrington
Dr. Robert S. Harrington, the chief astronomer of the U.S. Naval Observatory, died before he could publicize the fact that Planet X is approaching our Solar System.
It is extremely unlikely that a man would contract cancer and die within a matter of days, suffering the sudden impact of pain and debilitation characteristic of rapid onset cancer, while miraculously traveling on a physically demanding expedition and performing intensive astronomical operations.
Where are the astronomers and celestial physicists willing to openly and fully address the issue of this mysterious aberration of solar quiescence? Perhaps it is not the lack of understanding, but the memory of what happened to Dr. Harrington.
In the meantime, we do have Harrington’s estimate that that X is coming in from the direction of the constellation Scorpius. Perhaps that could explain the current positional interaction between Planet X and our Solar System’s outer planets. An interaction based upon assumption. Or as the movie Knowing would have us believe — the worst assumption imaginable.
We often received emails from people complaining about the mockery and abuse they receive from family, friends and co-workers when discussing this topic.
Our view is that this topic should never be introduced to others, until they demonstrate a geniune interest.
Nonetheless, those with a genuine interest in the topic will feel a natural urge to share their concerns about a possible threat to themselves and those close to them. Consequently, the most common questions they ask are, "where is Planet X, and what is the most likely worst case scenario?" GO
As moviegoers flock to see Sony's new 2012 film, critics, debunkers and cynics are spewing forth a flood of poison pen pronouncements.
Taken altogether, it is a bizarre twist on the Biblical story of Noah and the Flood — and with strikingly similar themes.
For those new to the topic of 2012, the film is great entertainment, but it also drives home an ancient failing of humanity. That the common folk are often the last to know, whether by their own choices or those made for them by wealthy and powerful elites. Ergo, many will never ask, "where will I be in 2012?" They'll just have enough time to ask, "My God, what's happening?" GO
|
Also For Your Listening Pleasure |
| HOME | RADIO | NEWS | EBOOKS | VIDEOS | MESSAGE BOARD | CATALOG | SUBSCRIBER |
| 2012 - Planet X | Earth | Extraterrestrial | Humanity | Nostradamus | SciTech | Space | War |
|
|
| ©2009 Your World, Inc. — All Rights Reserved | ||
| The Sagan Continuation Project: We WELCOME all who RESPECT our FREE WILL. If you CHOOSE to HELP, then help us to help ourselves. There is GOOD HERE too. WE LOOK for a reply, | ||
|
|
||
Scientists today are strangely puzzled about the recent drop off in solar hyperactivity. Sun spot activity is at an extreme low, which is accompanied by a 50-year, low in solar wind pressure. The situation is best summed up by NASA solar physicist Dean Pesnell of the Goddard Space Flight Center when he recently stated that, "
