| HOME | RADIO | NEWS | EBOOKS | VIDEOS | MESSAGE BOARD | CATALOG | SUBSCRIBER |
| 2012 - Planet X | Earth | Extraterrestrial | Humanity | Nostradamus | SciTech | Space | War |
|
Are you alone in your knowing? Join with Like Minded Others at Planetxtownhall.com |
|
|
Debunking the Planet X DebunkersYowusa.com Page 2 of 2Debunker Math
The video presents data from a 1992 NASA press release and a 1983 U.S. News and World Report article. Both address the existence of Planet X and speculate on the distance of the object. So Marshall raises the possibility that these two reports could be connected. Yet, disinformation artists and misinformed people attack the video with misleading math. The most common debunker tactic is to ignore the plus sign in the 1992 NASA press release and then simply subtract 7 from 50. They then say that a difference of 43 billion miles is impossible. But is it? This common debunker math postulates that 7+ = 7, which of course begs the obvious question. Do plus signs simply function as garnish for integers? News flash folks, a plus sign is just a plus sign. Look it up. Another debunker math assumption is that Planet X is in a stable orbit like the other major bodies in our solar system. A no-brainer for anyone with an auto parts pin up calendar on their wall. However, what we have been reporting on our site is that this object is in an inclined, comet-like orbit and we're not the only ones saying it. What an orbit such as this means, is that the speed of this object varies. Therefore, it is not constant. Yet, all the debunker math we've seen, and we've seen a lot of it, is based on constants. The problem with constants is that distance and orbits of an inclined, comet-like orbit requires a series of observations. This is why NASA says 7+. At that time, they were only able to determine that the object was beyond 7 billion miles away. Given that the lid slammed shut on Planet X reporting after this NASA press release, all we're left with is the initial 7+ finding. What we're not being given are the findings of subsequent observations. How convenient it is that the debunkers never mention this fact.
You're Not Alone! Join with Like-minded Others on the Planet X Town Hall
Now MBA's are Doing Debunker MathUp till now, we've only seen disinformation operatives and self-appointed debunkers. However a new class of debunker has arisen. The MBA astronomer and case in point is seen in another article sent in to us by contributor, Kurt Norwiky. It is an article from George A. Ure, MBA. Peoplenomics.com, 15-Feb-2009 However, at about 8:30 into Master's part two, we get two data points:
Now, this says that in 9 years, Planet X moved about 43-billion miles, so at the same rate of closure, it should have arrived in 1994 or so. I mean think about it: Something is coming in for nine years at 4.7-billion miles a year, and in 1992 has only 8-billion (or less) miles to go? The values reported in this video by Marshall were directly sourced to a 1992 NASA press release and a 1983 U.S. News and World Report article. These are documented facts from the public record. However, Peoplenomics.com publisher George A. Ure, MBA invents a whole new value with “only 8-billion (or less) miles to go.” Admittedly, it is the most elegant way we've seen yet, to redefine the functional aspects of a plus sign. With his other assumption about the “same rate of closure” he is using the same debunker math as disinformation operatives. The constant. Given all this, we'd love to hear from Mr. Ure about the authorities he used to turn 7+ into less than 8 billion miles without additional observation data. We'd also like to know why he bases his math on a constant velocity when the object is in an inclined, comet-like orbit. On the other hand, given that the author possesses an MBA we could now be seeing a whole field so science opening up — hedge fund astronomy. The possibilities are endless.
[1] [2]
|
||||
YowRadio.com
|
![]() |
In July 2008, a two-stage crop circle larger than three soccer fields materialized in England on a farm near Avebury, Wiltshire. Unlike more common symmetrical snowflake formations, this one evidenced a clear and unmistakable message: That in December 2012 we will see the appearance of a celestial harbinger. One that portends a global tribulation in which life as we know it will come to an end.
Fully coherent and free of exceptions, the Avebuy 2008 formation is an urgent warning from distant friends to those who get it and who want to get through it. That is why the first part of this book, "The Bad News," presents a series of more than 50 illustrations to decode this message with easy-to-follow, building-block explanations. Intended for the common man, the goal is to empower the reader and this need is great.
This is because those who survive the tribulation will live to bear witness to the single greatest die-back event in the history of our species. A pole shift as predicated by America's "sleeping prophet," Edgar Cayce (1877-1945) and it could happen as soon as 2013. When it does, it will be a time of testing that favors the meek over the wealthy and powerful. But not for reasons you might think.
If you get it and want to get through it, this is the book you've been waiting for. GO
New to the topic? This 5-part video series, will get you quickly immersed in the key concepts. From there, you'll be able to connect the dots for yourself very quickly.
Please feel free to share complete and unedited copies of these programs with others. All other rights reserved.
|
Cut to the Chase Internet Radio |
| HOME | RADIO | NEWS | EBOOKS | VIDEOS | MESSAGE BOARD | CATALOG | SUBSCRIBER |
| 2012 - Planet X | Earth | Extraterrestrial | Humanity | Nostradamus | SciTech | Space | War |
|
|
| ©2012 Your World, Inc. — All Rights Reserved | ||
| The Sagan Continuation Project: We WELCOME all who RESPECT our FREE WILL. If you CHOOSE to HELP, then help us to help ourselves. There is GOOD HERE too. WE LOOK for a reply, | ||