NOTICE TO OUR READERS: This is our last Planet X disclosure analysis. We stand by our reporting and encourage you to become self-informed.—Marshall Masters
Approach the content with an open mind so that you can give
it an impartial smell test for sincerity.
Human intuition is powerful. It
is the ultimate smell test, because as the old saying goes, “a fish stinks from
the head down,” and this smell test can only go one of two ways.
Step 1 — Smell Test
Use your intuition to sense the author or directors
intent. If you sense any form of
malevolence, bookmark it and go no further.
However, keep it in mind as unforeseen future developments may warrant
further examination. Like they say in
Texas, “even a blind hog can find an acorn.”
If you sense sincerity in the director, take immediate action. Download the video, and save the about text
to a file for a more detailed analysis and proceed to the next steps. Do not rationalize or chew on it. If you sense sincerity, grab it. Then, you’ll have all the time in the world
to chew on it.
The latest version of the Real Player has this download
feature built in to the free version.
The Movavi.com web site also offers inexpensive video download and
editing tools. They also offer a free
download and conversion tool which is very handy. This author’s preferred conversion formats are YouTube (FLV) to AVI or MPEG4.
Step
2 — Audience Metrics
A powerful way to
gauge the veracity of a video that passes the smell test is to monitor the
audience metrics. There are three audience metrics in particular: play rate,
YouTube comments and cross-talk.
Play Rate: Videos that
resonate as true at a visceral level will have high play rates. A simple test
is to monitor the play rate over time. If a video does not garner over 2,000
plays in the first 30 days, it is likely a hoax or disinformation attempt. Any
video, or multi-part series that receives more than 10,000 plays in the first
60 days is resonating with the audience as truthful. We've found this audience
metric to have an accuracy rate of approximately 80%.
YouTube Comments: The first YouTube viewer comments on a new video are
usually very good on balance. This is because they're contributed by people who
are actively looking for this kind of information. When viewing comments,
always begin with the first comments on the video -- not the latest. Try to
read these comments within the first few hundred plays of the video. As a video
breaks into the 1,000+ viewings range, you'll usually begin to see an
increasing number comments from vulgar cranks and sophomoric trash talk idiots.
Eventually, they can dominate the discussion in most cases.
Cross-Talk: Use Google Alerts to track the cross-talk on the web for a video. It
is a free service and you can use several different keywords. Always do the
director's YouTube screen name. For example, this author's screen name is
"yowbooks." As new web pages, message board posts, videos, blogs,
etc. pick up on this video, Google will index many of them. With the alert, you
get a free and easy way to monitor cross-talk on the web. A highly rich source
of thoughtful comments, as well as totally moronic and vulgar idiocy. You'll
have to rake it hard, but there will be gems.
Use your word
processor to evaluate the text. Look for active and passive voice, average
sentence length and different spellings and misspellings. All these tools are
readily available. We use Open Office, which is free, for this
analysis, but other word processors, such as Word and Wordperfect, will do just
as well.
Step 3 — Textual
Corroboration
Check for corroborating textual information. If the director is offering images, look for
time and date stamps and the source’s relationship. Any text in the video is a good source and so is the about
text. Be sure to give higher preference
to text in the video than the about text.
The more information you can get the better. Dig, dig, dig!
The cardinal rule on Planet X / Nibiru images is the acquisition source. It must be named. Regardless of what you understand about astronomy, do not give
any weight to images unless you're given the name of the observatory or
spacecraft that first acquired them.
Hoax and disinformation videos are typically vague or evasive about
this.
Scroll down to continue...
Surviving 2012 and Planet X Video
This 5-part video series offers a straightforward view of this coming human event. Produced and hosted by Marshall Masters, a former CNN science feature field producer, it is an ideal Planet X / 2012 primer for those new to this vital topic.
Planet X / Nibiru 2012
Flyby
Scenarios —
February 2009 Report
Produced and narrated by Marshall Masters, the first part of this February 2009 video report focuses on the revised upwards estimates for a more violent solar maximum in 2012.
The second half of the program presents a series of 2012 Planet X / Nibiru flyby scenarios developed by Jacco van der Worp, MSc. Based on core criteria called “the electrical kill zone,” it presents several Planet X / Nibiru flyby scenarios.
This HD theater offers subscribers the best possible online viewing experience with our many video programs. It uses the new DivX 7 HD player with the H.264 DivX codec to deliver reliable streaming with superb quality.
We limit this online theater to subscriber use only. The result is that you do not have to compete with a global audience, for the same media stream. Your video selection will start quickly and play smoothly with optimal video and audio quality. GO
Step 4 — Image
Analysis
Perform a simple image analysis. You can take screen captures of individual frames in the movie
using MS Moviemaker or most any popular video editing program. Save using high resolution formats. This author’s preferences in order are TIFF,
BMP and JPEG.
You’ll need some basic video editing program such as Photoshop Elements or
Corel Draw to enhance the images so as to reveal details. This author uses a program called Compupic
Pro for basic analysis.
Two things you want to look for are square edges on the objects. These are dead giveaways for
cut-and-paste. Hoax images will be very
blocky, where disinformation images will be more polished and will require
closer study. However, a check for
image degradation is the real acid test.
Hoax and disinformation images of objects will become mushy and soft as
they are enlarged. Images obtained with
modern astronomy imaging systems hold up far much better and keep a soft,
natural tonal gradation at the object edges.
Keep in mind that, while
these are very basic image vetting procedures, they are sufficient to detect
any hoax image, and they are also very helpful in analyzing disinformation
images.
Step 5 — Verification
Counting the number of videos posted by a director is not an
accurate verification tool. This is
because a sincere whistle-blower may only be able to squeeze out a few videos
before being intimidated into silence. On the other hand, a religious fanatic or vigilante debunker usually
spews hours of programs onto the YouTube site.
In the movie Ms. Doubtfire, comedian Robin Williams invented
a great description for many YouTube directors. “Run-by fruiters.” A most
perfect description for religious fanatics and vigilante debunkers.
This brings us to a logical question. Aside from finding a smoking gun,
independent source or someone with a reputation who is willing to go out on a
limb, how can you verify a sincere disclosure video? In a word, you use “synchronicity.”
A fatal mistake of many investigations is the rush to
judgment. This has to be labeled, that
has to be decided and the whole thing wrapped with the appropriate pink or blue
ribbon. With what is looming ahead of
us in 2012, that is simple Lemming behavior. Humans, unlike Lemmings can benefit from their own synchronicity awareness.
Simply put, when you come across something you cannot sort
out, intellectually put it in a jar and set it on the shelf. One day, the universe will drop a label in
your lap and if you’re tuned into your own sense of synchronicity, you’ll know
exactly which jar to slap it on. There
is a lot of information on the Web about this, so Google “synchronicity” to get
started.
So, if you’re ready to put the pedal to the metal, let’s
apply what we’ve learned up to this point as we examine live YouTube Planet X /
Nibiru videos. (Continue to next page...)
Planet X Special Report
“Chance favors the prepared mind."—Louis Pasteur
Planet X Special Report No. 1: Where is Planet X?
We often received emails from people complaining about the mockery and abuse they receive from family, friends and co-workers when discussing this topic.
Our view is that this topic should never be introduced to others, until they demonstrate a geniune interest.
Nonetheless, those with a genuine interest in the topic will feel a natural urge to share their concerns about a possible threat to themselves and those close to them. Consequently, the most common questions they ask are, "where is Planet X, and what is the most likely worst case scenario?" GO
The Big Six Man-Made Catastrophic Scenarios for 2012 and Beyond — Survival Author Matthew Stein and Jacco van der Worp MSc
As moviegoers flock to see Sony's new 2012 film, critics, debunkers and cynics are spewing forth a flood of poison pen pronouncements.
Taken altogether, it is a bizarre twist on the Biblical story of Noah and the Flood — and with strikingly similar themes.
For those new to the topic of 2012, the film is great entertainment, but it also drives home an ancient failing of humanity. That the common folk are often the last to know, whether by their own choices or those made for them by wealthy and powerful elites. Ergo, many will never ask, "where will I be in 2012?" They'll just have enough time to ask, "My God, what's happening?" GO
The
Sagan Continuation Project:We
WELCOME all who RESPECT our FREE WILL. If you CHOOSE to HELP, then help
us to help ourselves. There is GOOD HERE too. WE LOOK for a reply,
Part 2 — Vetting Protocol 
