| HOME | RADIO | NEWS | EBOOKS | VIDEOS | MESSAGE BOARD | CATALOG | SUBSCRIBER |
| 2012 - Planet X | Earth | Extraterrestrial | Humanity | Nostradamus | SciTech | Space | War |
|
|
|
|
Dr. Eltjo Haselhoff –
|
Galileo Galilei (born 1564) is considered a key pivotal figure in the Scientific Enlightenment. On April 12, 1633 he was forced to appear before the Inquisition on for the first time to defend his work titled "Two Chief World Systems." His arguments were persuasive, and the Inquisition agreed to let Galileo modify it so that it would be clear of all suspicion of heresy.
However, the pope rejected the Inquisition's solution and wanted Galileo charged with heresy. Consequently, he was brought before the Inquisition a second time and was accused of being a heretic and threatened him with torture.
Galileo said he was not a Copernican and that he had abandoned the opinion in 1616. Then he said "for the rest, here I am in your hands; do as you please". Well, that certainly seemed agreeable and Galileo was found guilty of "vehement suspicion of heresy" which is a lesser change to heresy and "Two Chief World Systems" was put under the index of banned books.
Galileo was also forced to "abjure, curse, and detest" the Copernican heresy and to promise to denounce all such heretics.
Now keeping this in mind, let’s point our attention to SETI’s final thoughts on this event: “Bottom line? The crop circles are decorative, but not informative. We can expect better from true extraterrestrial intelligence.”
By its own admission, SETI has stated that it has a bias in the form of its own expectations. Therefore in terms of expectations, who is to say what is, or what is not heresy. In this manner, there is really no difference between the SETI researchers who are profoundly insulted by the manner of the reply, than those who judged Galileo a heretic during the Inquisition.
Wouldn’t this be an excellent reason for an advanced civilization to respond in the manner demonstrated at Chilbolton, so as to avoid running the same kind of hurdles as Galileo.
Remember, Galileo was forced to modify his work in order to avoid an adverse judgment during his first Inquisition trial. In the same vein, if SETI received the message before anyone else in the world, SETI could arguably modify that signal to make it comply with their own perceptions and beliefs, before releasing it to the public.
If these crop circles were created by an advanced civilization, what they demonstrated with these crop circles is that they known an Inquisition when they see one, and that they gracefully sidestepped it by placing their answers in the field next to the telescope for everyone to see.
The SETI Institute Online
Is the Latest Crop Circle
a Message from E.T?
Continued...
How come they look like us? Hollywood aliens always look pretty humanoid, but this is an anthropocentric conceit. Visit the local zoo, and you'll find critters that share 3.5 billion years of evolution and a lot of your DNA. But they don't look like you - they look like fish, or alligators, or…
In reading this, the first thing that comes to mind is: Are radio astronomers cross-trained and competent genetic researchers as well?
We just finished mapping the human genome, and yet there is still so much we do not know. Actually, we have still yet to definitively identify that which we still do not know about genetic evolution. Nonetheless, it appears that SETI has a George Lucas view of the world, which will no doubt encourage some hoaxer to create a Jabba the Hut crop circle.
In other words, isn’t SETI stepping a bit outside of its own field here?
[1] [2]
We often received emails from people complaining about the mockery and abuse they receive from family, friends and co-workers when discussing this topic.
Our view is that this topic should never be introduced to others, until they demonstrate a geniune interest.
Nonetheless, those with a genuine interest in the topic will feel a natural urge to share their concerns about a possible threat to themselves and those close to them. Consequently, the most common questions they ask are, "where is Planet X, and what is the most likely worst case scenario?" GO
As moviegoers flock to see Sony's new 2012 film, critics, debunkers and cynics are spewing forth a flood of poison pen pronouncements.
Taken altogether, it is a bizarre twist on the Biblical story of Noah and the Flood — and with strikingly similar themes.
For those new to the topic of 2012, the film is great entertainment, but it also drives home an ancient failing of humanity. That the common folk are often the last to know, whether by their own choices or those made for them by wealthy and powerful elites. Ergo, many will never ask, "where will I be in 2012?" They'll just have enough time to ask, "My God, what's happening?" GO
|
Also For Your Listening Pleasure |
| HOME | RADIO | NEWS | EBOOKS | VIDEOS | MESSAGE BOARD | CATALOG | SUBSCRIBER |
| 2012 - Planet X | Earth | Extraterrestrial | Humanity | Nostradamus | SciTech | Space | War |
|
|
| ©2009 Your World, Inc. — All Rights Reserved | ||
| The Sagan Continuation Project: We WELCOME all who RESPECT our FREE WILL. If you CHOOSE to HELP, then help us to help ourselves. There is GOOD HERE too. WE LOOK for a reply, | ||