Are you alone in your knowing? Join with Like Minded Others at Planetxtownhall.com

Man-made Global Warming is a Global Cooling Conspiracy

YOWUSA.COM, 11-March-2007
Marshall Masters

…Continued

A pithy observation from the science fiction classic, Dune, by Frank Herbert best encompasses the scope of our present climate engineering knowledge. “He who can destroy a thing, can control a thing.”

We can and regularly do both.

A good example was the ozone depletion scare of the 1980's. Although the data was not absolutely conclusive beyond any doubt at the time, we knew the principal cause of ozone depletion was the freon gas leaking from our refrigerators, car air conditioners and so forth.

Why was it a scare? The ozone in our planet's thin outer layer is what you might call a friendly warming gas. This is because it blocks the most toxic spectrum of ultraviolet light (UV light) to us, and our biosphere. Because it was being eroded, the scientific data at that time "suggested" (not proved beyond a shadow of a doubt) that dire consequences for human life on this planet would emerge with continued ozone depletion.

While ozone is invisible to the eye, the skin cancers on our mottled bodies would have stood out like sore thumbs. Likewise, the pictures of UV irradiated crops dying in the fields would replace the infotainment we now enjoy on our nightly news programs. Worse yet would have been another largely unseen disaster. Our oceans also begin to die due to a reduction in plankton populations, eventually resulting in a real life Soylent Green scenario.

The disaster film Soylent Green (1973), starring Charlton Heston, sounded a power global warming alarm, with much the same impact as Al Gore's feature length documentary, An Inconvenient Truth.

In a hot and miserable global warming future in New York, Heston plays a detective. In the course of investigating a murder, he comes across a secret report written by the victim that describes the death of the oceans and the shocking consequence. To cope with the dying oceans and a hungry population, world leaders have implemented a form of industrialized cannibalism to feed the world; satisfying, protein-rich green crackers. Hence the famous line from the movie, "Soylent green is people!"

So was a great performance by Heston (who also played Moses) and a lot of inconclusive data sufficient enough for the industrial barons to justify the stupefying costs of abandoning inexpensive freon gas in favor of an ozone-friendly alternative? Yes, even though the rate of loss, which was determined to be just 3% a year would have allowed industrialists plenty of time to confuse the issue long enough to amortize costs and thereby please profit-minded Wall Street traders.

In fact, The Montreal Protocol, which banned the use of ozone depleting freon and halon gases, was signed in 1987, which from a debunker standpoint could certainly be viewed as a rush to judgment. Given that the measured rate of ozone depletion was approximately 3% per decade, we could still be arguing that ozone depletion, like global warming is just another urban myth. Heck, we'd still have over 90% of the ozone layer well into the early part of the 21^st century, which means we took action while there was still oodles of time to have to a confusing debate. Besides, there are the obvious upsides:

• Drug Companies and HMO stocks would soar, thanks to a global skin cancer pandemic.

• Congress would give ozone-depletion polluters huge tax breaks and Superfund handouts to fix the problem.

• America would become the Saudi Arabia of wheat, giving windfall profits to farming corporations so they could eradicate those pesky family farms once and for all.

With such wonderful upsides like these, why did we fix the problem early on?

— or more to the point —

Why was there no decades-long, confusing debate over the science of ozone depletion?

Nobody was paying for one. Get it?

The Need for a Global Conspiracy

One visit to Los Angeles will tell you that America's skies are cleaner. One visit to New York's Hudson river will tell you that America's waterways are cleaner. Given all this, doesn't it make sense for the supposedly evil industrial polluters of the world to pay to confuse the debate over global warming? Is there likewise an imperative to stop the antics of wild-eyed tree environmentalists like Al Gore from blocking progress with useless fear-mongering?

Somebody is paying for these kinds of questions. Get it?

Why those who silently hold power are paying for this confusion is NOT about greed. It is about the continued existence of our industrial societies.

To put this in perspective, let's zoom in on a micro view of our world and then zoom way out for the big picture.

When we zoom in to view life in the micro scale, we see the typical Joe Homeowner. Burdened with the costs of heating and cooling his home, he constantly tinkers with the environment in his home using a technological gadget called a thermostat. For Joe, the formula is simple: comfort versus cost.

Leaving Joe behind, we now zoom out to the widest macro scale imaginable; the one controlled by the elite few who manipulate the global stage from from the shadows offstage. Like Joe, they also use technology to tinker with the environment, but on a vastly different scale. You could say, they use the mother of all thermostats. So what does that look like?

On a Joe Homeowner thermostat micro scale, we use digital touch pads, dials and such. On the thermostat macro scale, the power elites use warming gases and cooling particles. Of course, there is a difference here, but is it a big difference? Not really. OK, fine, then what is? The big difference is why we tinker with our thermostats in the first place.

|On the micro scale, it is mostly our own comfort level relative to the cost of fossil fuels. On the macro scale, it is relative to what created those fossil fuels in the first place; the Sun, and what it is doing to the Earth.

Solar Variation Theory

Over the years, global warming activists have pursued a single-minded approach that builds much like tree rings. Every year, the trunk gets thicker, but it is always the same tree. Global warming debunkers, on the other hand, have changed their tactics several times.

Until the last year, the various attacks were Earth-centric, which means they intentionally sidestepped any counter argument that looked beyond the thin atmospheric shell of our planet for causal factors. While the environment was relatively calm, ad hominem attacks on global warming activists and assurances that things were getting progressively better were sufficient. The problem was that they didn't get progressively better, and now, the global warming debunkers have been forced to employ more desperate measures. Their leaking just enough of the truth to keep a lid on things, and in doing so, they've finally abandoned their Earth-centric tactics.

A new centerpiece for debunkers is the Solar Variation Theory . This theory links solar activity to temperature variation on Earth. Ergo, when the sun is more active, Earth is warmer, and vice-versa. When the Sun is less active, it is time to get your snow boots on for a millennium or two.

Of course, most in the meteorological community are skeptical, and they feel that theories such as this come and go. No wonder a popular grade school science assignment is to have the student track the percentage of the time a local weather forecaster gets it right.

In lieu of that, let's see what Sami Solanki, the director of the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Göttingen, Germany has to say about the Solar Variation Theory:

London Sunday Telegraph, 9 July 2004
Hotter-burning Sun Warming the Planet

The sun is burning hotter than usual, offering a possible explanation for global warming that needs to be weighed when proceeding with expensive efforts to cut emissions of greenhouse gases, Swiss and German scientists say.

"The sun has been at its strongest over the past 60 years and may now be affecting global temperatures," said Sami Solanki, the director of the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Gottingen, Germany, who led the research.

"The sun is in a changed state. It is brighter than it was a few hundred years ago and this brightening started relatively recently — in the last 100 to 150 years," Mr. Solanski said.

Average global temperatures have increased by about 0.2 degrees Celsius (0.36 degrees Fahrenheit) over the past 20 years and are widely believed to be responsible for new extremes in weather patterns.

Globally, 1997, 1998 and 2002 were the hottest years since worldwide weather records were first collated in 1860.

When Solanki offered compelling support for the Solar Variation Theory in this newspaper account, 2004 was already well on its way to become the 5^th of the 20 hottest years on record.

To date, every year in this century has made the top 20, and 2006 leads the pack. Likewise, eight of the years in the last decade of the 20^th century made the list as well. Still, the global warming debunkers are as outspoken as ever. The change is who they're assaulting. Events have upped the ante from tree-huggers to US government scientists.

Washington Post, 10 January 2007
Climate Experts Worry as 2006 Is Hottest Year on Record in U.S.

Last year was the warmest in the continental United States in the past 112 years -- capping a nine-year warming streak "unprecedented in the historical record" that was driven in part by the burning of fossil fuels, the government reported yesterday.

"People should be concerned about what we are doing to the climate," said Jay Lawrimore, chief of the climate monitoring branch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "Burning of fossil fuels is causing an increase in greenhouse gases, and there's a broad scientific consensus that is producing climate change."

The only people left to convince that global warming is not a real phenomenon are those who are too afraid to look beyond the sound bites our media are feeding us. The debunkers know this is giving us diminishing returns; so what's next?

YowRadio.com
Prepare for the Future

5 PM PST / 8 PM EST
Chat Room + Call In
YowRadio.com

Tuesday, January 31, 2012
GUESTS: Richard Shaw and Dan Dean

The Return of the Annunaki: Part 1 of 2 — How the Elites are Preparing

Something is coming this way from the depths of space, and elites are preparing at a frenetic pace - but for what?

That's the big picture story this panel will pursue in this first episode of a two-part series. GO

Tuesday, February 7, 2012
GUESTS: Richard Shaw and Dan Dean

The Return of the Annunaki: Part 2 of 2 — What We Can Do as Individuals

Wakey-wakey folks, this is 2012, and the future of humanity is already in destiny overtime. GO

BEAT THE ELITES: Virtual Consciousness Swarming and Remote Viewing

This video present a new occupy movement strategy based on cold war esp research that combines virtual consciousness swarming and remote viewing.

One that can give us the power of mind, to change the world for the common good and for which the elites have no defense.

Crossing the Cusp: Surviving
the Edgar Cayce Pole Shift
by Marshall Masters

The Bad News You Expect and the Good News You Need

In July 2008, a two-stage crop circle larger than three soccer fields materialized in England on a farm near Avebury, Wiltshire. Unlike more common symmetrical snowflake formations, this one evidenced a clear and unmistakable message: That in December 2012 we will see the appearance of a celestial harbinger. One that portends a global tribulation in which life as we know it will come to an end.

Fully coherent and free of exceptions, the Avebuy 2008 formation is an urgent warning from distant friends to those who get it and who want to get through it. That is why the first part of this book, "The Bad News," presents a series of more than 50 illustrations to decode this message with easy-to-follow, building-block explanations. Intended for the common man, the goal is to empower the reader and this need is great.

This is because those who survive the tribulation will live to bear witness to the single greatest die-back event in the history of our species. A pole shift as predicated by America's "sleeping prophet," Edgar Cayce (1877-1945) and it could happen as soon as 2013. When it does, it will be a time of testing that favors the meek over the wealthy and powerful. But not for reasons you might think.

If you get it and want to get through it, this is the book you've been waiting for. GO

Surviving 2012 and Planet X

New to the topic? This 5-part video series, will get you quickly immersed in the key concepts. From there, you'll be able to connect the dots for yourself very quickly.

Please feel free to share complete and unedited copies of these programs with others. All other rights reserved.

YOWUSA.COM Announcements

Cut to the Chase Internet Radio with Marshall Masters cttcRadio.com STREAM FOR FREE (Cable/DSL/56K Dial-up)